Written by jeseahed the 15 Apr 11 at 23:47.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
The main problem with Lime survey is that groups and questions have all different IDs. If you copy a survey, the survey ID will change (and this is normal) but all the question IDs and the group IDs will also change.
This way of working makes Lime more difficult to integrate with outside applications. It also prevents having features like a bank of questions which one could pick into.
Example: I am passing company name parameter from another application (my ERP for instance) to a given question in one survey. I will use the SGQA Identifier which will be for instance 12345X1X1001.
Now, if I duplicate the survey into another one, and simply need to change two or 3 questions, lime will necessarily rename the survey ID (which is normal), but will also change the group ID and all question ID. What I passed to 12345X1X1001 will now need to be passed to 54321X2X1002 for instance. This means that from the external application, I must maintain a different map per survey - which is time consuming.
If Lime would not automatically increment the group and question numbers, passing (and retrieving) parameters would be far easier because only the survey ID would need to be changed. This would mean that the company name of all of my surveys could be passed to DDDDDX1X1001 with DDDDD being the survey ID to point to. In that situation, I would be able to copy the map of a survey to the next and simply change the mapping for questions which have truly changed versus the original survey copy.
I understand there might not be an easy way of achieving such purpose, at least I wanted to place that rationale in the pool of ideas as it is important for Lime to be integrable with other tools. I believe its current structure is a barrier towards that objective.
Written by iboguev the 15 Mar 10 at 07:41.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
Hi,
I am using LimeSurvey to capture and store some relatively sensitive/interesting data. I am a bit concerned that the application doesn't provide (as far as I am aware) any built in features that will discourage potential admin login brute force attacks.
Written by LuK123 the 14 Jul 10 at 16:36.
Global category: Question types.
New
Hello,
we use your program in our company. We are working on a project and need some assistance with a specific question type.
We use an array(Yes/No). But we need behind of each column (labels table) a text box, in order to make some notes, or to justify each answer wether "yes" or "no".
Is it possible that you create such a question type for us?
Written by eckes the 14 Nov 09 at 21:19.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
If one uses LimeSurvey for Voting it would be good if one can publish the list of votes at the end, so each voter can check, if his vote is recorded correctly.
For this to work, the user should receive a code under which the vote is recorded. This code should be different from the token, since otherwise the token sender can correlate the vote to the email address.
It must also be ennsured that the code cannot be issued twice by LimeSurvey.
Written by mjm4842 the 11 Nov 10 at 21:20.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
Thank you for making LimeSurvey available to the Internet community. I have a great appreciation for all of the effort that has gone into developing this application and as such I would like to contribute by proposing an idea and including a solution.
I am trying to have the results of a survey emailed to the a person listed in one of the questions. I am using the INSERTANS:... tag in the "email response to" field. So far this works in accordance with the documentation at:
Ideally I would like to just display the names or job role of the recipient and not their actual email address so as to protect it from automated email address harvesters.
Here is a sample situation: A medical clinic with 20 doctors is conducting a survey. Each doctor wants to receive a copy of a completed survey from their patient. Although I could create 20 identical surveys at 20 different URL's, it would make more sense to just have one survey and have the respondent pick their doctor's name from a list.
Another reason to only want one survey is that I still want the results to be gathered into a single database so that I can generate reports and statistics for the clinic where the 20 doctors work.
Written by vierundzwanzig the 4 Nov 11 at 09:58.
Global category: Statistics.
New
use case
The creator of a survey should be able to include a lottery into the survey. The participant will leave his/her e-mail address for participation in the lottery. In the admin tool it should be possible to see how many people have participated in the lottery and randomly select a number of e-mail addresses for the winners.
requirements
- If the participant takes part in the survey no conclusions about the participant should be possible. For example if the e-mail address is stored in the same survey database table or the sessionID and timestamp of the participation of the survey and lottery are stored in both of the two separate tables.
- The lottery should be part of a survey. It should not be a link to a new/additional survey (with navigation and "submit" button).
- The selection of winners should be done automatically by the LimeSurvey admin tool.
Written by ameghani the 29 Mar 11 at 01:12.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
Majority of the times people we use survey to generate statistics across multiple projects.
If I have the same questions asked to same people on different projects and present the data collected on multiple surveys collectively.
Can we have this feature in which we can have reporting on a global basis which is applicable to all the projects.
Written by darknico84 the 4 Nov 10 at 10:04.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
In some situation where you have to "replay" many times the same filters sets on various surveys (but with same question set) it can be very long and bothering to click each time on hundreds of filter sets.
Written by dabrahams the 25 Oct 10 at 03:56.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
Everything from the system where the admin "window" that prominently says "Question Groups" in it is actually the controls for the survey (etc.) to the multiple-click hoops I have to jump through to do trivial things, to the fact that once I set up a condition I can't even make trivial changes to the dependency questions without first deleting the condition in the dependent speaks for a total redesign.
Written by freddekkers the 14 Dec 09 at 12:37.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
I would like to replace the surveyurl in the invitation e-mail ( and the reminder mail) by a button. Potential respondents are not interested in the numbers the see now.
Written by bkgray the 6 Nov 11 at 20:20.
Global category: Tokens.
New
I run many surveys that use closed access and multiple token attributes for each user. I recycle several of these surveys over the course of an academic year, or from year to year.
In these surveys, there are several places where some text should change for each run of the survey, but should be consistent within the run. For example, one survey is used to collect vacation travel plans from students. The name of the vacation changes every time I run the survey, but it appears in several places within the survey and in the invitation emails. Similarly, I specify dates (used for input validation) that are the same for all students but change for each vacation.
Currently, I manage this by using a token attribute to specify the text, and refer to that attribute throughout the survey and email text as appropriate. This works, but it requires that I add the text as an attribute to the token for each student, even though it's the same for each student.
I would like to suggest a feature that would create a set of attributes for the survey, in addition to the attributes for each token.
Written by sociolog the 8 Sep 10 at 04:04.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
Some dual scales would look and feel better if the scales were not next to each other, but on the either side of the subquestion titles: Scale 1 - TITLE - Scale 2 (e.g. importance of item X - TITLE of item X - Satisfaction with item X, same for items Y, Z and T).
Written by pmonstad the 5 Apr 11 at 12:20.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
I can't see why the user has to enter ID manually when creating question groups or questions. There should be an option letting LS auto generate IDs which the user can override if needed.
Written by seancarlos the 20 Jun 11 at 07:48.
Global category: Tokens.
New
List-Unsubscribe is a mail message header used to provide machine readable unsubscribe instructions - an email address, a URL or both.
If List-Unsubscribe is present, some mail clients will offer a unsubscribe button and/or unsubscribe option if a user tries to flag the message as spam.
It is a recommended 'best practice' to improve message deliverability and do the right thing for the end user.
Written by Tiepies the 9 May 11 at 14:45.
Global category: Statistics.
New
Randomization of questions is a great feature included in LimeSurvey 1.91. For people using LimeSurvey in psychological research, however, knowing the order in which randomized trials are presented can be important. In the analysis of psychological data, trial number is often included as an additional variable, to account for learning or fatigue effects.