Written by pmonstad the 10 Oct 09 at 19:00.
Global category: Logic & Conditions.
New
Making conditions in LS are very time consuming.
The existing condition rules are only useful when asking a very few additional questions, as the condition has to be entered as a rule to each question. There is no way for example to easily make whole question groups conditional.
so, /mba is a alternative URL to /index.php?sid=37424.
Say to my user some thing like "Please, enter in 'my.site.com/survey/mba' and answer the survey!" is more easy (and mnemonic) that say a URL with text and numbers.
Written by kakarountas the 7 Nov 11 at 09:14.
Global category: Logic & Conditions.
New
I am a manager at a small enterprise and I would like to ask my employees for completing a self-assessment form created using LimeSurvey. However, before forwarding it to the board, I would like to add at least some comments to each completed survey for each employer (alternatively a reply to 5-10 questions per completed questionnaire would also be ok).
Written by holch the 18 Sep 11 at 16:50.
Global category: Logic & Conditions.
New
At the moment the survey is either on or off. It would be great if there would be the possibility to give a survey different statuses like "open/online", "paused", "finished", etc.
The admin could mark the current status and respondents would receive different messages when opening the link like the survey itself in case of "online" and something like "The survey is currently paused/not active, please come back later" and "This survey has been closed, as we have reached the necessary amount of participants".
Written by Oak the 12 Aug 11 at 01:38.
Global category: Logic & Conditions.
New
LimeSurvey currently does branch logic throughout the survey and it works great. However, if I have a happy client or a dissatisfied client, sometimes I want to route them to different completion pages. Instead of a single end message, I would prefer at least 2 pages I could direct people to based on a condition from the survey.
Written by panthia the 11 Aug 11 at 08:21.
Global category: Logic & Conditions.
New
I am planning to create a large number of surveys that can be grouped into different categories. I would like to have multiple survey list pages and assign surveys to different pages so that the will be grouped together and not mixed in to other topic surveys.
Written by paso the 2 Aug 11 at 16:39.
Global category: Logic & Conditions.
New
Due to stipulations by our human subjects committee, we are not allowed to make all questions/items required (i.e., where participants would not be allowed to proceed until they have completed everything). As a result, we often get missing data because participants will inadvertently skip a question/item.
Written by Shnoulle the 18 Jul 11 at 12:00.
Global category: Logic & Conditions.
New
If we need to present some group to specific token, maybe in some order, or if we need to present some answer in specific order for some people, it's very difficult to do in javascript.
Written by wabrit the 14 Jun 11 at 13:39.
Global category: Logic & Conditions.
New
In some circumstances it's quite difficult to statically configure the endURL of a survey.
An example of this is when hosting the survey in a portlet as part of a portal container. Portlet render URLs tend to be quite complex in construction and it's certainly inadvisable (and quite difficult) to construct them statically.
Written by wabrit the 8 Jun 11 at 11:22.
Global category: Logic & Conditions.
New
I'd like to be able to take the assessment score and, rather than have limesurvey apply rules for handling the score, be able to pass it back to my application so that it can determine the best course of action.
Written by lwc the 17 Nov 10 at 19:35.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
It's frustrating for everyone involved when surveyors detect wrong answers in their post-submit "print answers" link, only to realize by then it's too late.
Such a feature would create more reliable and more user friendly surveys.
Written by pmonstad the 5 Apr 11 at 12:20.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
I can't see why the user has to enter ID manually when creating question groups or questions. There should be an option letting LS auto generate IDs which the user can override if needed.
Written by lfanfoni the 7 Mar 11 at 15:04.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
In my experience there are many cases where you need to make a check of the compiled data, as inserted on a single field as between fields.
For single fields it's possible to define mandatory and validation checks. For checks on differents fields it's necessary to develop JavaScript ad-hoc functions.
For example:
Question1 (multiple numeric): Number of employees by sex
Question2 (multiple numeric): Number of employees by class of age
Question3 (multiple numeric): Number of employees by qualification
Check: totals of 1, 2 and 3 must be the same
Written by patorough the 9 Feb 11 at 15:31.
Related project: 2.x all.
New
Usually when a survey is designed to be completed group by group, the survey taker has to click next button. In a recent survey at work, one of the feedbacks I got was that it would be time and effort saving to have the questions automatically presented once the current question was answered.
So, why not add the choice to survey designer to deactivate or hide "NEXT" button if they wish to use auto-navigate; also the option to hide "NEXT" button if any mandatory questions on page are not yet answered.
Written by agwd the 2 Feb 11 at 02:22.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
Use of the #answerNNXNNXNN id means code must be updated for all questions that are re-used, in order to re-target form elements. This is tedious, error prone, and frustrating.
The solution proposed does not suggest removing the #id, but adding an alternative for scripting targetting.