<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[LimeSurvey idea tracker]]></title>
    <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent</link>
    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:48:07 +0100</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:48:07 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
 

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] Presentation of un-answered mandatory questions]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/118/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[It's very usual to find users submitting the form with mandatory questions unanswered. Then the page gets reloaded again with a change of css to point out the such questions. The problem is when a survey page is too long with more number of questions then the user needs to scroll all along to find out what he missed. This is fine but a better alternative can be thought of.<br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #1: Using Light Window type interface</b>
<br />

One solution is to use a light window type interface. Whenever user submits (clicks next button)  the page, all unanswered questions will be popped out in a light window notifying the user that they are mandatory. This provides a easy UI and a good surveying experience. After filling these missed mandatory questions he'll be taken forward as usual.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:53:37 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/118/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] Abrupt ending or Closing the Survey]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/117/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Every now and then we find incomplete surveys.<br />The user might get bored in the middle (happens usually for long surveys) and/or close his browser window (can be sometimes unexpectedly ) which results in incomplete survey.<br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #1: Option to email the link</b>
<br />

Whenever the user closes the browser in the middle of the survey, a confirmation screen should pop out asking him to enter his email so that he can continue answering that particular survey at a later stage if he wish to.<br />A link to that particular session should be mailed to the user<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 09:51:02 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/117/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] Drupal integration]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/116/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Drupal is one of the most popular open source CMS'es, but it's not geared towards complex surveys. I think that both Drupal and Limesurvey would benefit from a Drupal-Limesurvey integration module.<br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #1: Drupal / Limesurvey modules</b>
<br />

Some research needs to be done to decide what should be integrated and how that can be accomplished. I think the most important is to synchronize or share the users:<br />- from Limesurvey, Drupal users could be invited to fill out a survey;<br />- users of a Drupal site could fill out (and create?) surveys without logging in again (single sign on);<br />- a logged-in user could see in Drupal which surveys are available for him.<br /><br />At least, a Drupal module would be needed. Depending on the architecture and API's of Limesurvey2, a module/mod/plugin/addon for Limesurvey might be needed as well.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:20:51 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/116/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] Individual CSS for each survey]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/115/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[When you want to style question for an individual survey you have to manually include a css file or edit the overall template. It would be nice to have additional, surveyspecific CSS in a separate CSS file that can be edited from the survey screen instead of from the template editor.<br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #1: Include a surveyid.css</b>
<br />

Have the template check if a .css exists and include it when it does. (could be generated for a new survey but left blank initially)<br /><br />Add an edit survey css button to the survey toolbar where one can jump to a special template editor screen where you can edit this sid.css<br />Would be nice if there were links in the screen to point people to the appropriate item in the wiki for help.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:42:02 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/115/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] Email throttling like PhpList]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/114/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Many shared hosting providers have an hourly limit on how many emails you can send out.<br /><br />To manage this limit, you have to babysit LimeSurvey and press the button in batches.<br /><br />If you exceed the hourly limit, bunches of emails will not go out and often you will receive bounced email messages.  It is a mess to determine who did get your invitation / reminder and who did not.<br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #1: Email throttling similar to PHPList</b>
<br />

PHPList is an open source newsletter package that I use to keep in touch with my subscribers.  <br /><br />It has an email queue that automatically works through batches of emails until it has sent all them all.  The email queue can process automatically using cron jobs.<br /><br />Since PhPList is open source and LimeSurvey is open source, maybe PHPList would share some lessons learned and allow sharing of some of theri current code?<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:59:59 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/114/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] Offline Surveys]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/113/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I was thinking about this quite a while already. It is not always possible to do a interview online (CAWI) or via telephone (CATI). When programming is necessary CAPI comes into the game.<br /><br />However, most CAPI-Tools are old and boring and additionally you have to have still another program.<br /><br />However, wouldn't it be greate to be able to use Limesurvey for all those purposes. However, even with UMTS/3G it is not always possible or reliable enough to do it with a online survey tool.<br /><br /><br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #1: Limesurvey CAPI feature</b>
<br />

In times of Google Gears and HTML5 I was wondering if it would be possible to use the survey offline?<br /><br />Tine20.org for example is using Gears to make the application usable offline. Or Gmail, etc.<br /><br />I am not sure if this is possible with a very complex and flexible tool like Limesurvey, but maybe it is?<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:31:31 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/113/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] Totals fields for Array (Multi Flexi) (Text) (numbers only)]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/111/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[We have a survey that requires participants to fill in a time sheet. We would like to show them the total hours for each task. We also need to record these totals in the survey results.<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Add three additional attributes for Array (Multi Flexi) (Text) (numbers only)</b>
<br />

1 it might be worth making the question Array (Multi Flexi) (Text) (attribute: numbers only) into it's own question type<br /><br />2 add the following attributes:<br />  Show totals<br />  * row = total for each row (an additional column)<br />  * col = total for each column (an additional row)<br />  * both = totals for both columns and rows (an additional row and column)<br /><br />  store totals in results<br />  * 1 = store column/row totals in results<br /><br />  Grand total<br />  * 1 = show grand total only<br />  * 2 = store grand total in results (do not display)<br />  * 3 = show grand total and store in results<br /><br />Java script would calculate totals for columns/rows and would be able to hand negative numbers and floating point numbers.<br /><br />for visual example see<br />http://apps.acu.edu.au/~evanw/LimeSurvey_custom-q-type_array-mulit-flexi-text-numbers-only.html<br /><br />Please ignore styling as this should be done with CSS.<br /><br />I can help with the HTML side but can't help with JS, DB LS admin stuff.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 01:42:17 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/111/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] How to visualize questions, logic & conditions]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/107/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Some surveys can be very complex.  <br /><br />For my last survey, I had a committee deciding the groups and questions.  We used FreeMind to come up with our structure.<br /><br />
<br />



<b>[-2 votes] Solution #1: Visual Question Tree using MindMap structure</b>
<br />

It would seem to me that someone very smart person could make some script to convert survey data into  mindmap data.<br /><br />This would be a straight export from LimeSurvey to the mindmap data structure.  <br /><br />Branches can be colorcoded to denote conditions.<br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #2: Solution #2: Use a normal "folder visualisation"</b>
<br />

I agree that the MindMap Structure wouldn't really work.<br /><br />But I know some survey tools, that use a kind of "folder structure" as we know it from file explorers, etc.<br /><br />I think this can display filters and so on pretty well. At the moment Quotas, Filters, and questions are somehow displayed very seperate and it difficult to get a good overview of the survey (I do agree with the GregB here).<br /><br />But with the folder tree, you can show loops, filters, pages/groups and questions, which can be especially helpful for long and complicated surveys.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:28:38 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/107/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] Guide a respondent towards his/her saved questionnaire]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/106/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In many surveys in organisations, it's considered important that each respondent only replies once. Therefor, you use a token in order to allow each respondent to fill in a survey only once. However, it is now possible for a respondent who has saved his/her form, to start a second. The record created by the first, unfinished form is not removed from the database. As it is an anonymous survey, it's not possible to identify this record. If you want to guarantee the uniqueness of each respondent, there is no other option but to throw away all unfinished records, in which case you also remove records of respondents who had other reasons for not finishing the survey.<br /><br /><br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Cookie placed when saving a form</b>
<br />

The proposed change: place a cookie when saving a form. The cookie blocks the possibility to open a second form and informs the respondent that he/she should open the link in the received email. <br /><br />Ofcourse cookies can be removed if you really want to fill in a second form, but at least it will bring awareness to those who forgot they saved the form. <br /><br />Redirecting a respondent to the saved form is also important because it makes the tool appear more reliable.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:25:34 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/106/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[-1] Review all questions + Review all groups]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/105/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[A new use case:<br />the client wants to validate and approve all questions textes before giving GO/NOGO to the launch. This includes also: question help text.<br /><br />Rationale:<br />This is a likely checkpoint in a project. Since the questions are to be delivered to users, the client requests a final REVIEW/APPROVE to validate the textes before the launch.<br /><br />The same applyes to groups. This time, the to-be-approved textes are: group title, group description.<br /><br />Being able to edit the textes on-the-fly is considered a plus.<br />
<br />



<b>[-1 votes] Solution #1: add a review all questions,groups page</b>
<br />

This can be done with a single page, 2 tables.<br /><br />Table0: REVIEW ALL GROUPS<br />| gID | qTitle | gDesc |<br /><br />Table1: REVIEW ALL QUESTIONS<br />| qID | qText | qHelp |<br /><br />Edit on-the-fly:<br />Every table is also a form, and a final [Update] button applies the changes to all the fields.<br /><br />
<br />



<b>[-1 votes] Solution #2: the same, with a variation</b>
<br />

Keep all the tables in solution #1<br />Instead of a [Update], put a column at the end of every row, it's a "Edit" link that shortcuts to proper edit page of the question. That way, you reuse a php page and cut short on time.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:53:43 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/105/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[5] Preview for Question Group]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/103/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I have a preview for a single question which is really helpful.<br /><br />I would like to have as well a preview of a Question Group. This would help me to get an idea about the order and being lost in details. Would help especially for those questions at the end of a survey.<br />
<br />



<b>[5 votes] Solution #1: Button for group preview</b>
<br />

To have a button same as the Question Preview a Question Group Preview-Button.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 19:09:37 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/103/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[5] decouple survey settings in 2 pages]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/102/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Survey settings is composed of 2 pages:<br />1 Survey configs, with tuples (name-value) .e.g. Allow Saves Y/N<br />2 Survey textes, with survey title, welcome, endmsg.<br /><br />The first part of settings are set at start of your work with a survey, and rarely fixed later.<br />The behaviour of a survey is technical choice, with a tendency of no change over time. <br /><br />The second part is very frequently used, I believe it stays at the same level of questions and aswer, often modified for the same aesthetic or pratic reasons.<br /><br /><br />
<br />



<b>[5 votes] Solution #1: split in 2 pages</b>
<br />

The use case can be safely split in 2 use cases, by looking at the level of interaction the user need with the settings.<br /><br />A "survey messages" + <br />A "survey settings " (Retain old name)<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:12:56 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/102/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[3] Review all conditions]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/101/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[It's more productive to show and review all conditions in a admin page.<br />Mantain them from there (Edit, add, delete) is considered a plus.<br />
<br />



<b>[3 votes] Solution #1: add a page "Logic Management"</b>
<br />

Add a button to the survey button bar, next to "Token management"<br />Create a page to review all conditions in the current SurveyID<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:10:11 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/101/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[8] Duplicate survey feature]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/100/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I use the same survey, except for a few small changes, with different groups of people. I'd like the ability to just click a button and copy a survey, including questions, layout, etc., without needing to use the import/export feature. <br />
<br />



<b>[8 votes] Solution #1: Copy survey button</b>
<br />

Right next to the Export Survey Structure button, add a Copy Survey button. When you click on it, it asks for a new survey name. Click on that and it creates an exact duplicate (except the survey name) of the current survey structure and design. From there, you can open the new "inactive" survey and make any necessary changes.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:12:16 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/100/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[3] Add export LimeSurvey results to SAS.]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/99/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[SAS is a powerful statistics application that's pretty broadly used.  LimeSurvey already supports exporting results to R and SPSS, which are good packages, but many of our users prefer to use SAS.<br /><br />We'd like to see support for exporting LimeSurvey data into a format SAS can use, as has been done for SPSS and R.<br />
<br />



<b>[3 votes] Solution #1: Add export option for SAS</b>
<br />

As was done for R and SPSS, add an export option for SAS.<br /><br />SAS can import CSV if needed, but our users are asking for something that's easier - like they see for SPSS in LimeSurvey.<br /><br />SAS can read SPSS files if need be, so I guess that's another option:<br /><br />http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/mult_pkg/faq/fromSPSS_toSAS.htm<br /><br />though it would be nice to be able to export directly in SAS format.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:43:48 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/99/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] Fine rules to manage the results]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/98/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In older version of Limesurvey, it was possible for the author of a survey to manage the results (delete and modify the results).<br /><br />In the 1.87 version, it's now impossible. The user have to be super-administrator to do this.<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Add "modify results" in the rules option for a survey</b>
<br />

If it's possible, add a "Modify/delete" option rule for the survey users.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:40:13 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/98/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[2] Tics for slider layout]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/97/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Tics (aka tic marks) should be visible under the slider bar.<br /><br />See this sketch: http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/5295/10403feb10095848.gif<br /><br />benefits: easy read, make it clear it's a slider with discrete values, catch where the handle is in respect to left and right limits.<br /><br />Details:<br />type = multiple numerical input<br />options:<br />use slider layout = 1<br />slider min = 0<br />slider max = 10<br />slider accurancy = 1<br /><br /><br />
<br />



<b>[2 votes] Solution #1: add an option</b>
<br />

show_tics = 0 (default). Just as it is.<br />show_tics = 1 : the slider shows tics under the bar, between the slider_min and the slider_max values.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:06:24 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/97/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] Enforce Array (Multi Flexible) (Numbers), checkbox layout mandatory option.]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/94/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I believe that all question types on a survey should allow for mandatory enforcement which this question type currently does not. Since it doesn't and people taking the survey might not answer a question of this type, either on purpose or by accident there is no way to ensure data integrity. At the very least, if the question cannot enforce the mandatory option that option box should not be available in design mode. It allows an unsuspecting survey designer to include what could be a key question and not realize it could be bypassed and save what I assume would be a "0" answer even though it was not a respondant's intention. In some ways, this question is similar to a simple Y/N question. If the respondant clicks the next button without ever clicking one of the two options on a Yes/No question, the mandatory test stops you from proceding and warns that the question was unanswered. I would think the (Multi Flexible) (Numbers) checkbox layout question type should behave in the same manner. I have had students take surveys and have missing, potentially incorrect answers because the (Multi Flexible) (Numbers) checkbox layout questions will proceed even though they did not select any of the options and clicked the next button. However, I did set the question's mandatory option equal to yes. <br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Enforce the mandatory option on (Multi Flexible) (Numbers) checkbox layout</b>
<br />

I would like to see the mandatory checkbox on this question type work as it does on all the other question types I've used or be removed so survey designers do not make a mistake in assuming that a respondant will be forced to consciously  select an appropriate ansnwer.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:59:03 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/94/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] Validate anwers (responses) on the server (prevent tampering)]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/93/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Currently responses are checked on the client. But HTTP can easily be tampered such that arbitrary values are sent to the server. (E.g. the value 5 when only 1 to 4 is allowed.)<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Check on the server</b>
<br />

Validate data on the server. Only after successful validation the responses should be stored.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:40:17 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/93/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] new forum catagory - best survey showcase]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/92/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[There are few good survey examples to learn from. <br />  There are few adequated test surveys available.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />There are no real life surveys we can get access to learn from.  <br /><br />I suggest a new forum catagory - best survey showcase.  <br /><br />So that anyone in the community can submit a real life survey.<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: new forum catagory - best survey showcase.  </b>
<br />

new forum catagory - best survey showcase.  <br /><br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:18:15 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/92/</guid>
    </item>


  </channel>
</rss>

