<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[LimeSurvey idea tracker]]></title>
    <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent</link>
    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:06:39 +0100</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:06:39 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
 

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] I don't think a user should have to manually update the config-defaults.php fil]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/378/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[To set advanced setup configuration settings a user has to manually update the config-defaults.php file. When an the survey engine is upgraded, extra changes need to take place in the config-dfeaults.php file.<br /><br />Sorry, this request does not fit well with any of the Global categories.<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Allow setting advanced setup variables in the config.php.</b>
<br />

For instance, if someone needs to override the $publicurl value, it has to be done in the config-defaults.php. When a user creates their config.php, they might have all the information they need to set the $publicurl, yet they cannot set the value in the config.php.<br /><br />By updating the config-defaults.php to first check if the variable has been set, we can keep the user's version of the variable and set a default if needed.<br /><br />$publicurl = isset($publicurl) ? $publicurl : "$rooturl";<br /><br />Of course there are several ways to do this same logic.<br /><br />With the code above, if a user were to set a value for $publicurl in their config.php, it would not be overwritten by the config-defaults.php. If the user does not set the value manually, the value will still be set to the default value.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:33:19 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/378/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] allow token fieldname instead of attribute_1, autoimport]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/377/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[When I import a CSV file into the tokens table, using attribute_1, attribute_2, etc., is awkward, I'd much rather use company_name, website, etc., whatever my fields are.<br /><br />Then conditions and defaults could use those same names, e.g. TOKEN:COMPANY_NAME<br /><br />An auto-import function would be nice, something that could take a file like<br /><br />email,website,company_name,year_founded,industry<br /><br />and import it into the tokens table, automatically adding any new fields that weren't there.<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: add fieldname in tokens definition</b>
<br />

When tokens are defined, instead of merely asking "how many", it would need to change to a list format that asked the field names (and types, but that's a different issue!)<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:06:35 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/377/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] 3 solution for hide_tip]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/376/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In 1.92, there are a lot of new tip ( EM validation etc ..)<br /><br />Maybe we ca have multi solution for hide_tip option:<br /><br />0 : allways show ( default)<br />1 : hide in css and show if error ( actual no)<br />2 : completely remove tip ( even in HTML)<br /><br />Because, maybe there are some user who don't want tip, but want use help text like a tip :).<br /><br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Modify the attribute hide_tip in a list</b>
<br />

0 : allways show ( default)<br />1 : hide in css and show if error ( actual no)<br />2 : completely remove tip ( even in HTML)<br /><br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 13:56:23 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/376/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] Final or thanks message in closed surveys]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/375/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[When we need to close a survey, can expire or close it.<br /><br />In both cases, to show a message explain the end of survey and saying some thing like a "thanks by interesting".<br /><br /><br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Add more a field</b>
<br />

In the "Edit text elements", to add more one field for final message, that will filled with a thanks text or explanation about the closing of survey.<br /><br />Is more a consideration's question that a tecnical's question.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:58:08 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/375/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] Use a dedicated template engine]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/373/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Templating is great, but there's no reason that Limesurvey should have its own.<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Use TWIG or Smarty in LS2</b>
<br />

Both Twig (http://twig.sensiolabs.org/) and Smarty (http://www.smarty.net/) are dedicated template engines in PHP that can be used as the V part of a MVC framework.  They're fast and support caching.  Both use a decorator design pattern, much more flexible that the traditional set of "includes" that force the designer to add all sorts of "if" statements in a complex environment.<br /><br /><br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:50:59 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/373/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] Copy Groups]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/371/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[We should copy a whole group not just a question, then looping this group depending on a question.<br /><br />For ex: how many pets do you have: 3<br /><br />For each pet, you should have the possibility to answer the same question group.<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Copy button for groups</b>
<br />

There should be a copy button for whole groups.<br /><br />The conditions on a group is a request, which is already mentioned in another idea.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:49:04 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/371/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] Number sections and questions within sections]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/370/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[When I'm reviewing survey with other people, they want to refer to a question number.  In the same way that an administrator can optionally show the question code in a survey, I'd like to have the option to show section numbers and to order the question in section.question format.<br /><br />For example, if Section 2 is Attitudes about School, I'd like the questions to be numbers 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, etc.  The subquestions could even be 2.1a, 2.1b, etc.  That way, if I add another question, it doesn't throw off the rest of the survey.<br /><br />This is a pretty common way to do longer surveys.<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: add option for numbering format</b>
<br />

Change the printable survey and the on-line displayed survey to include the numbering scheme above.  It should be able to support BOTH question codes and question numbering, e.g. [2.4:years_in_therapy]<br /><br /><br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 02:23:32 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/370/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] Restrict access to survey by email.]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/369/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I am launching a survey open to a broad group in which all have a corporate email.<br /><br />It would be interesting can to filter access to survey automatically sending the acces link to survey only at the people who register with our corporate email (example: any@myfactory.com).<br /><br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Restrict access to survey by email.</b>
<br />

Insert a configuration dialog box where you can put this filter.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:00:48 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/369/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] Use Question Validation Equation only if person navigates past the question]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/368/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[It would be nice if the Question Validation Equation is only used when the user navigates past the question with the Question Validation Equation.<br /><br />If you, for example, use a Question Validation Equation in the third question of your survey and the participant answers the first question the third question will be shown in red if you don't check whether it is null or not.<br /><br />The situation is that the person didn't even try to answer the question because he/she is at a question before. But I think it would make sense to use/check the Question Validation Equation  only if the person is working with the question.<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Check validation after the person "leaves" the question</b>
<br />

An idea would be to check the validation after the persons "leaves" the question. For example with events like focusout, blur, change, click or whatever would be suitable to check whether the persons finished answering a question.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:12:19 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/368/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] Each page an unique body class]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/365/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In some cases I want to switch design aspects on different pages. <br />Currently this is only partly possible (by putting <br /> div class="group GROUPNAME"<br />in startgroup.pstl)<br /><br />But sometimes a whole page needs another header, footer or color. <br /><br />Giving each page an unique body class would make this possible. When each page is a group, it could be:<br /> body class="groupidentification"<br />, this could even be an extra field on group definition pages, next to group name and group definition.<br /><br />You could also do this on 1 question per page surveys.<br /><br /><br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Put it somewhere in the code</b>
<br />

I do not have programming skills, I am just a user, doing some templating. I wish I could...<br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #2: Need more input</b>
<br />

Think of this idea: http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/343/<br /><br />Can combine the 2 idea:<br />- extra input for survey : put in body (startpage.pstl and other)<br />- extra inout for group : add GROUP_ID and GROUP_CLASS in startgroup.pstpl, groupdescription, question.pstpl <br />- extra input for each question : included in QUESTION_CLASS (question.pstpl)<br /><br /><br /><br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:38:07 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/365/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] Allow mandatory ranking option to use min/max values]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/364/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Currently, if the ranking option is marked mandatory, then the maximum number of entries specified must be chosen; the minimum specified is ignored.  According to the response for Bug Tracker ID 05599, the "mandatory" indicator should be marked No if a range is desired.<br />The standard text for the option indicates that at least x items must be chosen. So if the minimum is at least 1, then the question is, by default, mandatory.  But, the question is not marked with an asterisk like all other mandatory questions.<br /><br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #1: Reference the minimum value</b>
<br />

Either add the asterisk if the minimum is greater than zero, or allow the minimum value to be used when "mandatory" is Yes.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:51:38 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/364/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] question translation - fast replace]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/362/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[To translate a question could take much time, if you have many answers. I tried the fast replace feature, but this replace the base language, too!!!<br />I tried the quick translation feature, but there are no group names  & question id's displayed. If you get a translation by question and try to copy the translation into it, this quick translation feature is not very helpfull.<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: enable the fast replace feature for translations</b>
<br />

enable the fast replace feature for translations, in oder that the base language isn't replaced anymore.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:07:42 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/362/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] Get easy (or clean) URL for easy reference]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/360/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[When i make a survey, LimeSurvey uses its internal ID to reference this survey in the URL. The idea is change this URL by a more easy.<br /><br />Example: A survey with employees that did MBA.<br /><br />"normal URL"<br />http://my.site.com/survey/index.php?sid=37424<br /><br />"Clean/easy URL"<br />http://my.site.com/survey/mba<br /><br />so, /mba is a alternative URL to /index.php?sid=37424.<br /><br />Say to my user some thing like "Please, enter in 'my.site.com/survey/mba' and answer the survey!" is more easy (and mnemonic) that say a URL with text and numbers.<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Look at Drupal project the alternatives URLs</b>
<br />

In Drupal (www.drupal.org), we make a node (story, page, blog's page, etc) and it gives a url like:<br /><br />my.page.com/?q=node/32<br /><br />And i can change this URL automatically using a module or writing the final part of URL, like this:<br /><br />my.page.com/title-of-my-post<br /><br />Inside of Drupal, have a table where have the 'translation' between system's url and user's url.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:39:23 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/360/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] Override Array Header Setting]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/359/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Currently the array headers will repeat according to a global setting.  It would be helpful if needed that the global setting could be overridden for a advanced setting on the question itself.  If nothing is entered on the question it will go by the default.<br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #1: Override Array Header Setting</b>
<br />

Have a check box in the advanced settings for array questions that allows to define unique repeating settings for that question.  The user would then enter the number of rows that it would like the header to repeat.<br /><br />Similar to checking an exclusive option on Multiple Choice questions and then entering the Answer Code.<br /><br />If the box is not checked, the headers repeat according to the global settings.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:28:10 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/359/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] The template editor returns to line 1 when saving]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/358/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The template editor jumps to the top of the script upon saving. This is annoying because I want to continue editing just where I was.<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: The template editor should not return to line 1 when saving</b>
<br />

That's all.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 16:28:30 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/358/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] No high-quality templates available]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/357/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The templates available for LimeSurvey are, compared to today's average webpage, rather unattractive. They lack attractive graphic elements like borders, fine colours, and colour gradients.<br /><br />Also, the templates on the limesurvey website mostly miss screenshots. The descriptions include deadlinks in many cases.<br /><br />The default template and other available templates are crucial for the attractiveness of limesurvey as a whole.<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: A set of attractive templates should be supplied with LS</b>
<br />

Measures should be taken to encourage users to make visually attractive and well-working templates and to publish them on the limesurvey website.<br /><br />Those with an interest in promoting LS should develop a bigger set of high-quality templates.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:55:22 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/357/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] The time for a rating scale question cannot be limited]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/356/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Sometimes it makes sense to limit the time to answer a rating question. In LS, though, it is not possible to limit the time of an array or radiobutton question, among other question types.<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: time_limit should be available for all question types</b>
<br />

The current restriction of time_limit to some question types should be removed.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 15:00:28 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/356/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] An user can not be granted the right to give other users rights of a survey]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/355/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[At the moment only super admins or the owner of the survey can modify the survey permissions.<br />If user A creates a survey and gives user B all rights to modify the survey, user B can not add other users to modify the survey. When user A goes on holidays and an other user (C) should get the rights to modify the survey, the admin have to be asked to do that.<br /><br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Grant a user the right to give other users rights of a survey</b>
<br />

It would be nice to have the possibility of giving a user the right that he can modify the survey permissions - including adding other users.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:06:18 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/355/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[0] Exit & Clear button CLEARALL: Wrong position in default template]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/354/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The button is on the bottom right. Through my statistics I have seen, that more than every third person clicks on that at some point during the survey. A few of them then start over, most of them don't. <br /><br />My guess is, that most of these clicks are accidental as users see a button to the right and click without reading because that's the expected position for next question group button.<br /><br />I have now moved this button to the left and will write about my experiences with that later.<br /><br />7 December UPDATE: Placement was in fact wrong!<br /><br />After I moved the button its click-rate is now down to one in ten users (not one in three as before) - the ones that just don't want to take the survey. Before replacement some started over again - even two or three times - a sign of accidental hits. Now only very few start over again after hitting the button - and only once at most.<br />
<br />



<b>[0 votes] Solution #1: Change the templates accordingly</b>
<br />

This is done easily manually, but it's a pitty if a new user like me first has to lose quite many of his participants to this layout mistake.<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:54:09 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/354/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1] To alleviate the problems caused by survey URL's split by email program]]></title>
      <link>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/353/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[If Lime Survey is installed in such a way that the root url for the survey is a long character string, the generated SURVEYURL may be longer than the line size of the email program.<br /><br />This results in the email program splitting the survey link over multiple lines, and in many email programs, these split URL's no longer function (i.e. the portion of the URL that does not fit on the first line is visible, but no longer part of the actual URL).  Clicking on such a broken link will lead to a failed attempt to access the survey, frustrating the invitee.<br />
<br />



<b>[1 votes] Solution #1: Add a new variable SHORTSURVEYURL which can be used as the invitation link</b>
<br />

I propose that one or more of the commonly used URL shortening services be contacted to determine if they have an API that would allow Lime Survey (or Lime Service) to call the URL shortening service with the value of SURVEYURL and return with a value which would be stored in SHORTSURVEYURL.<br /><br />The user would have the option of using the SHORTSURVEYURL in email templates to guarantee that survey urls generated by Lime Survey would be shorter than the "typical" line size of an email program.<br /><br />After initially posting this idea, I came across an existing API for the tinyurl service. Rather than repeating the code here, I will reference the page where it can be found...<br /><br />http://www.richardcastera.com/blog/creating-a-tinyurl-with-tinyurl-api<br /><br />The fact that this API already exists means that Lime Survey does not need to search for a URL shortening API!<br />
<br />


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:47:49 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ideas.limesurvey.org/ideatorrent/idea/353/</guid>
    </item>


  </channel>
</rss>


