Written by fullmann the 12 Nov 10 at 13:26.

With an editor for text-variables i could create a variable like require. when i insert this variable in a template, the configured text for each language would be displayed.

With an editor for text-variables i could create a variable like require. when i insert this variable in a template, the configured text for each language would be displayed.

Written by Mazi the 16 Nov 10 at 18:53.

A new template placeholder like MANDATORYEXPLANATION could be created which can be placed anythwere at a given template. If this placeholder is found, the program grabs the according string from the translation file.

A new template placeholder like MANDATORYEXPLANATION could be created which can be placed anythwere at a given template. If this placeholder is found, the program grabs the according string from the translation file.

Written by halliballi123 the 9 Aug 11 at 10:21.

- Button for saving (allready exists)

- Option for the creator of surveys for not needing username and password for saving and loading survey answers for surveys that are not anonymous.

After some discussions we found a working solution. It is already implemented, you just have to use the correct settings:

# Participant may save and resume later? = yes
# Enable token-based response persistence? = yes
# Anonymized responses? = no

- Button for saving (allready exists) - Option for the creator of surveys for not needing username and password for saving and loading survey answers for surveys that are not anonymous. After some discussions we found a working solution. It is already implemented, you just have to use the correct settings: # Participant may save and resume later? = yes # Enable token-based response persistence? = yes # Anonymized responses? = no

Written by mkhines the 20 Jan 10 at 16:19.

Give users a small map as a question, with a pushpin dropped in the middle. The user can move the pin around to the proper location on the map to select where they were. They can also zoom to a place in order to jump to the proper level of detail in order to accurately place the pin. E.g. a search box which if they typed in Madison, WI, would jump and center the map on Madison, WI, and have the pin handy for them to refine its location.

Give users a small map as a question, with a pushpin dropped in the middle. The user can move the pin around to the proper location on the map to select where they were. They can also zoom to a place in order to jump to the proper level of detail in order to accurately place the pin. E.g. a search box which if they typed in Madison, WI, would jump and center the map on Madison, WI, and have the pin handy for them to refine its location.

Written by wjc3 the 15 Apr 11 at 19:38.

Please add a single "Select all" box that can be checked which would then automatically select each individual token field.

Please add a single "Select all" box that can be checked which would then automatically select each individual token field.

Written by evan the 28 Apr 10 at 05:04.

In the 'Edit survey settings' > 'Presentation & navigation' tab add a yes/no drop down titled "Display question codes" This would then be checked when populating the template then apply if 'yes'

In the 'Edit survey settings' > 'Presentation & navigation' tab add a yes/no drop down titled "Display question codes" This would then be checked when populating the template then apply if 'yes'

Written by c_schmitz the 15 Dec 10 at 21:53.

Add a new attribute

$qattributes["exclude_all_others_auto"]=array(
"types"=>"M",
'category'=>$clang->gT('Logic'),
'sortorder'=>101,
'inputtype'=>'singleselect',
'options'=>array(0=>$clang->gT('No'),
1=>$clang->gT('Yes')),
'default'=>0,
"help"=>$clang->gT('If the participant marks all options, uncheck all and check the option set in the "Exclusive option" setting'),
"caption"=>$clang->gT('Auto-check exclusive option if all others are checked'));


and implement it accordingly.

Add a new attribute $qattributes["exclude_all_others_auto"]=array( "types"=>"M", 'category'=>$clang->gT('Logic'), 'sortorder'=>101, 'inputtype'=>'singleselect', 'options'=>array(0=>$clang->gT('No'), 1=>$clang->gT('Yes')), 'default'=>0, "help"=>$clang->gT('If the participant marks all options, uncheck all and check the option set in the "Exclusive option" setting'), "caption"=>$clang->gT('Auto-check exclusive option if all others are checked')); and implement it accordingly.

Written by c_schmitz the 19 Oct 10 at 11:59.

Create a new setting to hide the Welcome page.
The end page problem will be resolved by conditioned text blocks.

Create a new setting to hide the Welcome page. The end page problem will be resolved by conditioned text blocks.

Written by Mazi the 14 Jan 10 at 14:17.

Prevent the script from being run automatically without asking for the users agreement. List some of the following details first to identify which installation is updated:
- $sitename
- $adminname
- $rooturl

- $databasename
- $databaselocation
- $databaseuser
- $dbprefix

Add a link "Update this installation" to start the update.

Prevent the script from being run automatically without asking for the users agreement. List some of the following details first to identify which installation is updated: - $sitename - $adminname - $rooturl - $databasename - $databaselocation - $databaseuser - $dbprefix Add a link "Update this installation" to start the update.

Written by roB2009 the 2 Dec 10 at 15:47.

For that we would need a form in token area with:

„numbers of tokens“

„number of characters“

Press the „Create-Button“ and magic 700 dummy token are in the token table.

Export it, create a bulk letter.. stamps on it or inhouse mail...

For that we would need a form in token area with: „numbers of tokens“ „number of characters“ Press the „Create-Button“ and magic 700 dummy token are in the token table. Export it, create a bulk letter.. stamps on it or inhouse mail...

Written by Arthonas the 7 Apr 10 at 13:23.

As a possible solution the number fields should know the language used by the survey participant (variable) and interpret the number correctly.

As a possible solution the number fields should know the language used by the survey participant (variable) and interpret the number correctly.

Written by SvG the 18 Nov 10 at 11:42.

Page navigator could be a pulldown with group titles, though the groups to come should me unselectable on the first run if they contain questions that are mandatory, to prevent skipping these questions.

Page navigator could be a pulldown with group titles, though the groups to come should me unselectable on the first run if they contain questions that are mandatory, to prevent skipping these questions.

Written by ludogre the 3 Feb 10 at 11:40.

If it's possible, add a "Modify/delete" option rule for the survey users.

If it's possible, add a "Modify/delete" option rule for the survey users.

Written by lowprofile the 19 Jan 10 at 18:21.

add in a new field in either the survey list to show the administrator or have a "transfer ownership" of survey to the list of users

add in a new field in either the survey list to show the administrator or have a "transfer ownership" of survey to the list of users

Written by lemeur the 3 Jan 10 at 14:33.

* First of all, email messages sent by LS must be tagged in some way with an message-dest-id
This message destination id is made up of: the SurveyID, the target email address, the token code, and a specific integrity code.
This integrity code is used to make sure the bounce email is not a fake so that we don't disable some valid tokens.
The integrity code would be an ASCII verison of a HMAC of the previous elmeents encrypted with a key containing the token ID (internal element inside LS, and a global value specific to this LS installation and set in config.php).

* the probe will decode the bounced email to read the error message and get the original message-dest-id, then it would send the two data to LS-remote-command (via SOAP)

* The LSRC API will provide a service that would check the integrity and authentication of the message-dest-id and then update the token status accordingly.

Some references:
* Tagging with VERP solution: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_envelope_return_path
* Tagging in SMTP header (my preferred way): http://www.php.net/manual/fr/function.mail.php#78934

* First of all, email messages sent by LS must be tagged in some way with an message-dest-id This message destination id is made up of: the SurveyID, the target email address, the token code, and a specific integrity code. This integrity code is used to make sure the bounce email is not a fake so that we don't disable some valid tokens. The integrity code would be an ASCII verison of a HMAC of the previous elmeents encrypted with a key containing the token ID (internal element inside LS, and a global value specific to this LS installation and set in config.php). * the probe will decode the bounced email to read the error message and get the original message-dest-id, then it would send the two data to LS-remote-command (via SOAP) * The LSRC API will provide a service that would check the integrity and authentication of the message-dest-id and then update the token status accordingly. Some references: * Tagging with VERP solution: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_envelope_return_path * Tagging in SMTP header (my preferred way): http://www.php.net/manual/fr/function.mail.php#78934

Written by peterbrown05 the 12 Oct 09 at 09:57.

Use html/css formatting for the email send. Perhaps the ability to opt for text/html emails for those who use email clients without html

Use html/css formatting for the email send. Perhaps the ability to opt for text/html emails for those who use email clients without html

Written by tiprichard the 25 Sep 09 at 17:08.

Define the ability to attach files to the different types of questions. Have an extra field in the database to store the file in the database.

Define the ability to attach files to the different types of questions. Have an extra field in the database to store the file in the database.

Written by apps the 5 Feb 10 at 16:12.

The use case can be safely split in 2 use cases, by looking at the level of interaction the user need with the settings.

A "survey messages" +
A "survey settings " (Retain old name)

The use case can be safely split in 2 use cases, by looking at the level of interaction the user need with the settings. A "survey messages" + A "survey settings " (Retain old name)

Written by izahn the 16 Oct 09 at 07:24.

I don't think time stamps are the way to go. Just calculate the actual time spent.

It's actually kind of complicated I think.

1) If presenting one-question-per-page, have a question attribute "record time".
2) If presenting one-group-per-page, have a question group attribute "record time".
3) Store the value in a field named "QUESTIONID_time" if survey is presented question-by-question or "QGROUP_time" if survey is presented group-by-group.

If you have these all turned on in question-by-question presentation mode then you've just doubled the number of fields in your data set. So I don't think this should be and option at the survey level, only at the group/question level.

A related request is to set time limits for questions/question groups. After the time limit has expired the survey moves on to the next question/question group.

I don't think time stamps are the way to go. Just calculate the actual time spent. It's actually kind of complicated I think. 1) If presenting one-question-per-page, have a question attribute "record time". 2) If presenting one-group-per-page, have a question group attribute "record time". 3) Store the value in a field named "QUESTIONID_time" if survey is presented question-by-question or "QGROUP_time" if survey is presented group-by-group. If you have these all turned on in question-by-question presentation mode then you've just doubled the number of fields in your data set. So I don't think this should be and option at the survey level, only at the group/question level. A related request is to set time limits for questions/question groups. After the time limit has expired the survey moves on to the next question/question group.

Written by bighiller the 20 Jan 10 at 19:01.

I think there should be a way to give users/groups permission to view the results, but nothing else.

I think there should be a way to give users/groups permission to view the results, but nothing else.

Written by Boeing the 22 Apr 10 at 23:58.

We think it is good idea to create another level of permissions such as "Do survey only" and separate it from "Activate survey".

Greg.
akron2000@gmail.com

We think it is good idea to create another level of permissions such as "Do survey only" and separate it from "Activate survey". Greg. akron2000@gmail.com