Written by hardzsi the 26 Sep 09 at 15:37.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
The evaluated TOTAL assessment (sum) is nicely displayed at the end of the survey - which can only be seen by the user who filled the survey in.
However, this result is not stored at the answers database. After a lot of user filled the survey in, i would like to see the sums given for all of these users.
Now i have to export the answers and should repeat the assessment / summarize in Excel before i can see these TOTAL sums.
Written by tiprichard the 25 Sep 09 at 17:17.
Related project: 2.x all.
New
For assessments we need statistics about howmany people passed the assessment. (like an exam)
For auditing purposes we need reports how many points are scored per group as percentage of the total possible points. If possible shown in a spiderweb graph, where each group equals one line of the web.
Written by Biggi the 2 Dec 09 at 09:49.
Related project: 2.x all.
New
Hi,
we are using Limesurvey since the beginning of this year and the number of surveys increased. For administration the list of surveys becomes more and more confused. It would be great if one could organize the surveys in folders to have them organized depending on what belongs together.
Written by opirnia the 22 Nov 09 at 17:13.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
we are running limesurvey version 1.85+ (7337).
In questions using multiple numeric answers with sliders, sometimes we have answers that the participant can skip if they wish.
If they have clicked at all on the slider answer before deciding to skip it, however, a value is recorded. They can then slide back and forth after that but cannot go back to no value (so are in effect at that point forced to answer/have an answer value recorded).
We would like a way for participants to reset the slider value to nothing (not zero but no value) as if they had never clicked on the slider at all.
Written by Adam1V the 10 Oct 09 at 12:31.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
I believe the exported results should be much more user-friendly, after all, this is probably the biggest part of the survey; reviewing your results and yet the readability of the word export is terrible.
Written by tileca the 15 Dec 09 at 19:51.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
The 'exclude_all_others' attribute sould be available for any kind of Multiple
choice questions like:
P - Multiple Options with Comments
Q - Multiple short text
K - Multiple Numerical
and not just for:
?M - Multiple Options
It would be great if the 'other option' could be choosen as well to exclude all others.
Written by lovepade the 3 Aug 10 at 08:59.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
Currently the system can send out reminder emails, which is great. But the emails which people receive are identical regardless of whether they have already begun the survey (but not finished) or wether they have not begun the survey.
This is a problem because some people actually think that they have finished the surveye - or maybe forgot that the got interrupted. Some of theese people get annoyed when the recieve a confirmation mail.
Written by vs_arni the 28 Sep 09 at 15:57.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
Hi,
I explain with an example:
I have the same survey to do, but there are two different kind of partecipants.
One group is formed by industry managers, politicians, etc; the second one is formed by journalists, opinion leader, professors, etc.
So I would send a different invitation for each group. The first in a formal language and the second in a more friendly language.
I can import addresses and use the attributes to identify the group belonging for each partecipant.
Written by mfreund the 6 Jul 10 at 22:08.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
It would be great if questions containing subquestions (e.g. array questions with multiple questions) could display in statistics and graphs together on a single chart.
Also, pie charts are a poor way to display data that is not categorical in nature. Ordinal (e.g. education level) or scale (e.g. age) variables are hard to make sense of in pie charts.
For example, I often ask respondents to agree or disagree with a number of related statements. It would be good to view the responses together and displayed in a way that conveys that the responses are on a continuum.
Written by nobrain the 21 Jan 10 at 02:11.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
I need to collect more contact information on registration such as phone number, address, etc.
I can add an attribute for it (tokens) but then when the user visits, it does not ask for this info.
So, basically my idea is to have a setting "Public" and "Required" for attributes in tokens. Then, I can add an attribute such as "Phone Number" and set it to public and required and the user will be required to provide it to take the survey.
Written by Mazi the 23 Oct 09 at 16:24.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
When creating / testing / editing a survey mandatory question are really annoying. I can think of these situations where making questions of a survey (temporary) non mandatory will be a great improvement:
1. (Developer) Testing possible bugs
When importing a survey for testing mandatory question can drive you nuts.
2. (User) Previewing a survey which is in development
You just want to take a look at the questions and survey design, having to answer all mandatory questions is a mess.
Written by Rince the 6 Jan 10 at 14:47.
Related project: 2.x all.
New
Since the ID for the users gets calculated by the import (so, if the import is in alphabetical order we have an incremented order also in the IDs), someone could try to guess the ID of users if he has access to the mailserver-logfiles. Since the Webserver-Admin is most of the time also the admin of the mailserver on localhost, he would now have the possibility to de-anonymize some surveys.
Written by holch the 26 Feb 10 at 02:31.
Related project: 2.x all.
New
I was thinking about this quite a while already. It is not always possible to do a interview online (CAWI) or via telephone (CATI). When programming is necessary CAPI comes into the game.
However, most CAPI-Tools are old and boring and additionally you have to have still another program.
However, wouldn't it be greate to be able to use Limesurvey for all those purposes. However, even with UMTS/3G it is not always possible or reliable enough to do it with a online survey tool.
Written by atavei the 7 Apr 10 at 19:06.
Related project: 1.x all.
New
Nowadays, all research with human subjects require informed consent and authorization. The use of a program such as LimeSurvey in academic, government, or business environments require a mechanism of informed consent. In the specific case of academic environments, Institutional Review Boards WILL NOT APPROVE any type of research with human subjects without a mechanisms to verify the informed consent. Restrictions such as this are already found (or likely to be found in the near future) in government, medical and some business settings. Usage of LimeSurvey in academic--or other-- settings will be hindered by the absence of this kind of functionality.